This session will detail how the final systematic review or map reports should be produced. Requirements of CEE and other major organisations and publishers will be outlined, along with the sections and level of detail necessary for any report. Practical advice for ensuring efficient completion of a review report will be discussed, along with advice for ensuring acceptance of the review by stakeholders. The process by which systematic reviews and maps are typically peer-reviewed and published will be discussed. This session includes a practical exercise gaining experience of using the systematic review reporting standards, ROSES.
Learning objectives:
To begin, watch the following presentation:
You can find the lecture handouts here.
Next, read the tenth chapter of the guidance from the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence here. We'll revisit sections of the CEE Guidance throughout the course. It focuses on environmental and conservation topics, but is subject agnostic, meaning that it's useful for other disciplines, too. Feel free to focus instead on the Cochrane Guidance if you work with healthcare topics.
Please also read this article introducing the ROSES reporting standards:
In this practical exercise, you'll spend some time filling in a ROSES reporting form for an example systematic review.
Once you're done, check out the ROSES form that the authors filled in here. How did their responses compare to yours?
In the final module, you'll spend some time thinking about how to communicate your review findings to its end users.